Number of
Forms Received |
134 |
Number of
People Responding
(Includes spouses where both individuals were listed) |
221 |
Some
respondents owned more than one type of property so there is no direct coorelation between
the number of respondents and the number of properties. Also, I only applied one for
each type of property regardless of whether the respondent was single or a couple. |
| Primary Home Owner |
125 |
| Second Home Owner |
9 |
| Residential Lot Owner with no
structure |
20 |
| Resident leasing a home or
condo |
1 |
| Developed Commercial Property
Owner |
4 |
| Undeveloped Commercial Property
Owner |
3 |
| Business owner leasing space in
HSB |
3 |
| Not a resident or property
owner |
2 |
| Average Number of Years Here |
11.87 |
PEOPLE'S
OPINIONS:
In this case, when the respondent was a couple, I applied 2 to
each opinion and 1 for a single respondent.
|
| Majority
opinions are in Blue |
To protect
Horseshoe Bay from annexation or ETJ encroachment |
191 |
86% |
| To take advantage of using a
sales tax to fund maintenance |
118 |
53% |
| To prevent Llano County from
imposing a hotel tax on HSB |
119 |
54% |
| To stop Doug Jaffe from
developing more high density housing projects |
94 |
43% |
| To give property owners more of
a voice in the future development of HSB |
201 |
91% |
| To have more control over the
operation of the resort |
35 |
16% |
| To remove the POA from the
responsibility for our roads |
47 |
21% |
| To give us more enforcement
capability of our restrictions |
147 |
67% |
| To consolidate the MUD &
POA responsibilities into one entity |
83 |
38% |
Other (See Survey Comments)
Only one comment was recorded for each form. |
40
|
